Interim President Teresa K. Woodruff, Ph.D. | Michigan State University
Interim President Teresa K. Woodruff, Ph.D. | Michigan State University
Meta's recent shift in content moderation strategy has sparked debate about its effectiveness in tackling misinformation and hate speech. The company has moved from centralized fact-checking teams to a community labeling system, similar to the model used by X, formerly known as Twitter.
Anjana Susarla, Omura-Saxena Professor in Responsible AI at MSU’s Eli Broad College of Business, shared insights on this development. She noted that "combating online harms is a serious societal challenge," highlighting the role of content moderation in protecting users from consumer fraud, hate speech, and misinformation.
Content moderation involves scanning online posts for harmful content, assessing if they violate laws or terms of service, and intervening when necessary. Interventions can include removing posts or adding warning labels. Both user-driven models like Wikipedia and centralized systems such as Instagram have shown mixed results.
Meta's previous approach relied on third-party organizations like AFP USA and PolitiFact for fact-checking. However, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a transition to community labeling akin to X's Community Notes, which allows users to flag misleading posts.
Studies on the effectiveness of crowdsourced fact-checking are inconclusive. While some platforms have succeeded with quality certifications and badges, community-provided labels alone may not significantly reduce engagement with misinformation without proper user training. Moreover, research indicates potential partisan bias within X’s Community Notes system.
Susarla also addressed the impact of artificial intelligence on content moderation. As AI-generated content increases, distinguishing between human and AI outputs becomes challenging. Inauthentic accounts could exploit these vulnerabilities for economic or political manipulation.
Despite various strategies, research suggests that a combination of impartial expert reviews and collaborations with researchers and citizen activists is crucial for maintaining safe social media environments.
Alerts Sign-up